CASE
INFO
CURRENT CASES
303 CREATIVE LAWSUIT
FEDERAL LAWSUIT
So. CA. COMMUNITY COLLEGES LAWSUIT
JEWEL AMICUS BRIEF 2019
CALIFORNIA MAGAZINE BAN LAWSUIT
SAN DIEGO COUNTY BUSINESS OWNERS
REMINGTON AMICUS BRIEF
MAMMOTH LAKES v. NEWSOM
PRICE SCOTUS AMICUS BRIEF
SAN FRANCISCO v. AZAR
GRIMM v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
VIRGINIA v. FERRIERO
JOHNSON v. US
THOMAS MOORE v. BONTA (Becerra)
303 Creative – Lawsuit
US Supreme Court Takes Case of Colorado Business Owner
Colorado Law and Lower Court Would Force Business Owner to Go Against Her Conscience in Anti-1st Amendment Ruling
The US Supreme Court takes up the Case of Lorie Smith. A lower Federal Court had ruled against Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion in the case. The ruling went against Lorie, a Web Development business owner, saying Colorado can force her to promote messages that violate her conscience. The case was then appealed to the US Supreme Court and CCRF again filed an Amicus Brief.
303 CREATIVE – AMICUS BRIEF
ARTICLE – 303 CREATIVE LAWSUIT
Federal Worker – Lawsuit
Case filed on behalf of Federal Civilians and Contractors
Under California mandates, all Federal employees will need to be vaccinated
This is a recently filed lawsuit against the Biden administration for unlawfully mandating the vaccination or testing of all Federal Civilians and Contractors inorder to keep their federal employment.
Read the plaintiff declarations in support of the TRO by clicking the more information button below.
FEDERAL LAWSUIT BRIEF
FEDERAL PRESS RELEASE
CLICK FOR MORE INFORMATION
California Magazine Ban – Lawsuit
US Supreme Court Takes Case of Colorado Business Owner
Colorado Law and Lower Court Would Force Business Owner to Go Against Her Conscience in Anti-1st Amendment Ruling
The US Supreme Court takes up the Case of Lorie Smith. A lower Federal Court had ruled against Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion in the case. The ruling went against Lorie, a Web Development business owner, saying Colorado can force her to promote messages that violate her conscience. The case was then appealed to the US Supreme Court and CCRF again filed an Amicus Brief.
DUNCAN VS. BONTA (previously Becerra)
CLICK FOR MORE INFORMATION
COMMUNITY COLLEGES – Lawsuit
Lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Court addresses violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights act of 1964 and Religious liberties, among other serious statutory and constitutional violations.
This lawsuit is brought on by employees and students from Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District, San Diego Community College District, and South Orange County Community College District (hereinafter referred to as CCDs) to block mandatory COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates at these community colleges.
Plaintiffs claim the COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates are illegal and unconstitutional in that they purport to remove federal civil rights and constitutional protections and, they are asking the Court to issue preliminary and permanent injunctions to block the mandates currently in existence in the California Community College system.
THE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE – NEWS ARTICLE
SAN CLEMENTE TIMES – NEWS ARTICLE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORD – NEWS ARTICLE
Nevada County Restaurant Coalition – Lawsuit
Nevada County Restaurants get together to stand against Newsom and County unlawful mandates.
NC RESTAURANT COALITION MEMORANDUM
NC RESTAURANT COALITION LAWSUIT
CLICK FOR MORE INFORMATION
SAN DIEGO COUNTY BUSINESS OWNERS – Lawsuit
Owners File Suit against Governor Newsom’s COVID – 19 Guidelines
This is a recently filed lawsuit against the Biden administration for unlawfully mandating the vaccination or testing of all Federal Civilians and Contractors inorder to keep their federal employment.
SAN DIEGO BUSINESS OWNERS COMPLAINT
CLICK FOR MORE INFORMATION
© 2020 - CACRF.org 'CCRF' is a project of the FAITH AND FREEDOM FOUNDATION, Inc., Alexandria, VA., a 501(c)(3).
© 2021 - All Rights Reserved - Created by CoDiDigital.com